Tag Archives: zombie strategy

The Blimp

I saw a post on Facebook recently where someone proposed an interesting idea for a strategy to survive a hypothetical zombie apocalypse.

The main strategy centered on building a solar-powered blimp, using that for shelter as well as transportation instead of a brick and mortar stronghold. The post proposed that one could get water by lowering a bucket on a rope into fresh water stores. Food and other supplies could be gathered by dropping off scavenging teams while the main group stays aloft and out of danger, while acting as a lookout for the team on the ground. The post also identified a potential hazard, which would be a helium leak, which obviously would make things difficult.

I haven’t yet decided if I am for or against this idea, but I thought it would be a great subject for discussion.

Thoughts?


Re: The Bridge Stronghold

So a few weeks ago a colleague of mine pointed out a flaw in my bridge theory. Bridges require almost constant maintenance. Salt water is especially hazardous. Cracked or worn paint can expose the steel below to corrosion. Cracks in re-bar reinforced concrete are paths for salt water to rust and corrode the supporting steel re-bar beneath. The Golden Gate bridge undergoes painting year round to prevent corrosion. A bridge near saltwater would likely suffer significant structural damage rather quickly. Freezing weather also contributes to wear and tear on bridges. As water fills cracks and voids in the structure and then freezes, it expands those voids and can gradually damage or break apart pieces of the bridge or its foundation. Obviously survivors of a zombie threat would not have time to spend painting and checking bridges for cracks and thus bridge maintenance poses a serious problem to my theory of utilizing one for a stronghold. So this raises the question, zombie attacks aside, how long would such a bridge stronghold last against the onslaught of mother nature?There are several factors to consider, namely the environment the bridge is in, its age, and the materials and design used in its construction. On a very basic level, eliminating simple environmental factors like salt and ice should help us choose which bridges would be best. A bridge inland, over a river and away from the ocean, in a temperate climate less prone to freezing weather, would likely yield a longer lasting bridge. What about age, materials used, and the design of the bridge? How can we evaluate the best bridges to use?

Fortunately the Federal Highway Administration maintains a database called the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) that contains information on all bridges and tunnels in the United States. Not only does this database detail the location, age, materials, design, and length of the bridge, it also assigns each bridge a sufficiency rating and a structural evaluation.

Sufficiency Rating:
The bridge sufficiency is a method of evaluating highway bridge data by calculating four separate factors to obtain a numeric value which is indicative of bridge sufficiency to remain in service. The result of this method is a percentage in which 100 percent would represent an entirely sufficient bridge and zero percent would represent an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge.Sufficiency Rating is essentially an overall rating of a bridge’s fitness for the duty that it performs based on factors derived from over 20 NBI data fields, including fields that describe its Structural Evaluation, Functional Obsolescence, and its essentiality to the public. A low Sufficiency Rating may be due to structural defects, narrow lanes, low vertical clearance, or any of many possible issues.
Structural Evaluation:
Structural Evaluation is an appraisal rating that in plain English describes an overall rating of the condition of the bridge structure.This is the summary of the separately rated conditions of the structural components of the bridge. This is the truest measure in the National Bridge Inventory of the structural fitness of a bridge.

This tool would allow survivors to sort data for bridges in their immediate area and chose the most ideal bridge for a long-term stronghold… provided that they plan this out before the electrical grid goes down. The bridge stronghold may not be the ideal solution I thought it once was, but I if you chose your bridge carefully, it doesn’t have to be the rusted deathtrap my coworker makes it out to be.


Re: Zombie vs An NFL Lineman

I also disagree with Drew’s “You don’t want big guys” logic. Since Joe already detailed the various ways in which an NFL lineman would be useful to your zombie survival efforts, I would like to take a step back and further analyze the fallacies in Drew’s anti big guy stance.

The main crux of Drew’s argument centers on his assertion that big guys “can’t run as fast”. This line of thinking is misguided by a perception of relativity. Sure an NFL Lineman is not as fast as an NFL wide receiver or running back. And since the only environment we’re used to seeing these men in is that of an NFL game I can understand how many people would perceive these men as slow.  However, that is not the case with this scenario. We have been asked to choose 1 NFL player to add to our group of otherwise presumably average humans. There is a common joke (I’m sure many of you have heard) that goes “you don’t need to be able to out run the bear…just your slowest friend” and while that exact statement does not apply here the general mentality is accurate – your group of survivors is only as fast as your slowest member.  Having Chris Johnson sprinting away from zombies with his 4.24-second 40yd dash does you no good if you can’t keep up (and trust me you can’t).

So now that we’ve established this scenario a little better, the question becomes will an NFL lineman slow you down? To answer this, let’s do a little “Tale of the Tape”. Since Haloti Ngata was mentioned specifically in the original question I’ll use him as our example and take a look at the 6’4” 340lb man’s his NFL Draft Combine results from 2006 (note: since the pre-draft combine is really the only time NFL players are officially measured these are the measurements we must rely on. It is likely that after a 7 year NFL career – where his entire life revolves around physical performance – his measurements may have improved across the board).

Lets start with pure straight-line speed. To measure this the NFL uses the 40-yard dash. At the 2006 Combine Haloti Ngata ran the 40 in 5.13 seconds (an average time for an NFL Lineman). Now I consider myself to be a fairly in shape individual, and have always been relatively fast when playing sports amongst my peers. However I have never run a timed 40 yard dash in under 5 seconds. In fact my brief research seems to indicate that your average in shape individual would run a 40-yard dash in about 5-6 seconds. In other words, Ngata is not slowing down your group of survivors simply by being slow, and should still be easily capable of outrunning any zombies in pursuit of him .

Skipping over for now the  3 cone drill and 20 yard shuttle (because nobody outside of NFL scouts really knows what a good time is, much less how it might be applicable  to a zombie apocalypse) lets move on to a simple test of strength, the bench press. At the NFL Combine, the athletes are asked to bench press 225lbs as many times as possible. In 2006 Haloti Ngata did this 37 times. Shit most people I know can’t even lift that once. I tried to find bench press results for the fastest wide receiver from 2006, but most of the wide-outs didn’t participate in the bench press at the combine, likely because they didn’t want to be embarrassed by how weak they are. For further reference, when Ngata was still in college (the only official measurement I can find, again, I’m sure he has improved this by now) his 1 rep max was 495lbs. That’s like 3 people.

UPDATE: More likely than not, your zombie survival team is going to consist of at least a few women. So how will they stack up compared to our NFL lineman? I managed to track down some of the all-time records for the University of Maryland’s Field Hockey team. These girls are elite athletes playing for arguably the top field hockey program in the country. But how do they stack up against the example of Haloti Ngata? The top 3 40 yard dashes ALL-TIME for the field hockey players are 5.05sec, 5.11sec, and 5.14 seconds. All respectable times, but essentially the same speed as Ngata. If we take a look at the top 3 Vertical Jumps we get results of 27, 27, and 25.5 compared to Ngata’s 31.5. This number was pretty eye opening to me, despite his gargantuan stature, Ngata can still get up. When you consider the strength numbers that he produces (discussed earlier) I wouldn’t be surprised if Ngata could throw some of those girls higher in the air than they could jump (while comical to think about, its something I can picture being pretty useful in certain situations).

So think about those numbers for a little while and then tell me again… What NFL player would you choose to join your zombie survival team?


Zombies vs An NFL Lineman

I was reading the Deadspin.com fun bag when I came across this interesting question:

Which NFL players or coaches would you want in your crew when the inevitable zombie apocalypse arrives? Do you go with a goal line package like Vince Wilfork and Haloti Ngata, for the biggest human shield possible?

Here’s what columnist Drew Magary had to say in response:

You don’t want big guys. It’s not like they require more bites to turn full zombie. They have more surface area for nibbling, and they can’t run as fast. You need players who have agility, who can learn to use a lobo in a relatively short period of time and outrun the zombie hordes. And you need to make sure those players aren’t ME FIRSTERS who will steal all the food from the campground and go freelancing on their own. That means Russell Wilson can play for my zombie killing team any day. You won’t catch him standing around during Armageddon! And you need Jim Harbaugh. If there were a zombie attack, I would do everything Jim Harbaugh said. He would scream at me to start digging protective trenches and I would say, “I can’t do it coach. I’m too tired and I’ve lost half my leg!” and he would grab me by the collar and scream, “DIG THAT TRENCH OR I WILL FUCKING EAT YOU MYSELF” and an hour later there would be a trench. Coach Jim pushes you to places you never thought you could go!

I disagree with this “you don’t want big guys” logic. I think we are forgetting that zombies can’t bite through football pads.  It wasn’t specified in their premise if the players have their football pads or not, but let’s assume they do have their pads with them when the outbreak occurs. Better yet, lets take our lineman to a Dick’s Sporting Goods and get him some chest protectors, elbow padsgloves, shin guardsneck pads, and any other kind of lightweight pads (essentially zombie body armor). Thirty minutes of good looting at any sporting good store and our lineman is now a nearly indestructible zombie killing tank.

The next time I’m choosing a team to help me battle crowds of undead bloodthirsty monsters, I think I’ll take the guy who has trained for his entire adult life to fight through a line of 300 lb men trained to stop him. Not to mention how useful his strength would be when it comes to other tasks that pop up during an apocalyptic scenario. He would certainly be able to carry more weapons supplies and provisions than any other team member of normal size and strength. How many times does a situation arise where zombies are trying to follow a group of survivors and they must hold a door shut to keep the zombies at bay. If you were in that situation, what would you give to have a lineman there to help you?

Sure leadership in an emergency situation is important, but even the strongest leadership can break down when people are panicking. That kind of leadership only works when the rest of the team has been conditioned to follow the commands of the leader. Sure an NFL coach is going to be a good leader in a zombie apocalypse  but his team, who has worked with him and respects him as a leader, is more likely to benefit from his leadership than a rag-tag group of survivors. When the only thing that stands between you and a group of savage, mindless, creatures, hell-bent on ripping your intestines out with their bare hands, who do you want standing next to you? 300 lbs of brute strength? Or a short old guy barking orders at you?


The Bridge Stronghold

I’ve been chewing on an idea for a stronghold concept for a bit. The basic theory is that a bridge would be an easily defensible position in the event of a hypothetical zombie apocalypse. While the idea is not without its disadvantages, I think it has a number of significant advantages that I haven’t seen previously addressed in any zombie lore.

1.       Easy to find – While obviously not the most abundant structure, a bridge would be easy to locate in a world without cell phones and GPS. Bridges are over water, and most people are familiar with the major rivers in their respective areas. So find a river, follow it downstream and you are quite likely to come across a bridge.

2.       Strategic value to others – If you are of the mindset that other survivors can contribute to your groups safety and overall survival plan, then a bridge is going to be a natural place to meet other survivors. Positioning yourself on river crossings will increase the chances that travelers will come by you, giving you the chance to increase the numbers of your group. If you feel that other survivors either cannot be trusted, or cannot offer any help to your group, this position gives you an opportunity to ambush them or charge them a toll, supplies in exchange for passage.

3.       Easily defensible – Whether you are defending yourself from other survivors or from zombies hordes, this position is quite different from most traditional strongholds. Elevated above a body of water, you have only two points of access. Major bridges must by definition be located along major highways, which are likely to have a number of abandoned cars. These cars can be repositioned, ideally they still have keys and little gas, or pushed into position to form multiple rows of barriers. Vehicles parked very tightly to each other, blockading the entire width of the bridge will force attackers to have to climb over them, slowing them down and providing additional time for defenders to pick them off, especially with headshots, as attackers peek over the barriers. When the attackers overtake the barrier, they face another, as defenders fall back and continue picking them off.

4.       Safe evacuation route – In the event that all the rows of barricades are overtaken by zombies, or at least it becomes clear that takeover is imminent, the survivors can always escape to the water below via makeshift rope ladders. Ideally the survivors would be able to find and anchor one or several boats nearby, that could provide safe locations to wait out the zombie horde. If the horde does not disperse to levels which can be overthrown, then survivors can always use the boats to seek safe harbor down river.

5.       Renewable supplies – If the bridge is located over freshwater, then survivors can boil water for drinking, and presumably any body of water of significant size would have some sort of fish that can be caught for fresh food.

Now I recognize that most large bridges are located near large population centers which would be a bad place to hole up during the initial outbreak, this is not meant to be a strategy for the weeks of the initial outbreak. This is meant to help survivors regroup and weather a longer term outbreak event.